Sunday, November 05, 2006

Understanding Timing in Animation Part 2

Please read Understanding Timing in Animation Part 1 before continuing

Because timing is such an important part of an animated presentation, one of the best planning tools for any animator is a stop watch. You can get a great stop watch for estimating the timing of actions for less than $10 at most discount stores. Some people think they need a special “animator's” stop watch which has built in calculations for film footage and/or frames, but this isn't really needed.

Footage is actually another way of representing the amount of time that something is shown on the screen. Depending on the size of the film stock used, you can calculate the number of feet or fractions of feet used to present a specified amount of screen time. Basically instead of saying something lasts on the screen for 16 frames at 24 FPS, you would say it lasts for 1 foot of 35mm film length. The length of film footage created per week has been used historically in many studios as a method of measuring production output. Footage is not a big deal in computer animation, we don’t think in terms of film stocks, and all that you need to calculate the needed number of frames is to know the FPS constant for your movie and then multiply it by the number of seconds or fractions of a second that you decide represents the action. Just remember you can’t have a fraction of a frame, so everything is rounded to the next whole frame.

Once you determine the speed, the spacing is largely a matter of intuition and visualization that comes from lots of practice and experience. Most animators come to understand and appreciate that the “pencil test” is a major often repeated step in the process of adjusting an action’s timing. Fortunately “pencil tests” are quick and easy to perform in the computer world. Each timing problem is unique and there are no simple formulas, it’s primarily a process of trial, adjustment and experience.

We will soon learn how to create and use “timing diagrams” which graphically represent the number of frames used and their relative spacing. An older term for these diagrams, which I also like, is to call them railway diagrams because they resemble a sort of train track. In a complex bit of character animation you will potentially create a number of different timing diagrams because there are many concurrent timing problems associated with the various parts of the performance. But there are more basics to cover before we layer on that complexity.

Rhythm and Beats:
Most timing of actions is based on rhythm. As animators we often learn to get a feel for the timing of an action by humming a little sort of rhythmic beat like “dum-de-dum”. Many animators tap the end of their pencils on their desk to get a feel for the beat. Here is a great trick I recently learned to use as a training aid for getting a better feel for timing rhythms. We can call these rhythm tests. For this example we will set up a movie time line with two seconds worth of frames. How many frames is that going to require? The answer is that it all depends on the presentation frame rate. Our chosen frame rate is 24 FPS. So how many frames do we need for a two second time line? The answer is 2 seconds X 24 FPS = 48 frames. So now we can visually simulate all kinds of timing rhythms by just creating a frame with a black matte that covers the entire movie screen. Then we can place additional copies of this black matte frame at some regular intervals along our timeline. For this example we will put one every 12th frame starting with frame 12. So that’s frames 12, 24, 36, and 48. Now go back and fill in all the other frames preceding each “black” frame with a blank frame or a “white” matte frame. Now you can publish the movie and you will have a timing rhythm that “flashes” a black timing frame every half second. Get the beat? Using this same technique you can set up different timing patterns and then observe them. It’s a neat way to develop a good sense for the various rhythms of timing.

12 beat timing

Animation timing is often expressed as having particular beat, like 20 beat or 12 beat or 8 beat. Here’s how that comes about.

Each piece of music has a timing signature. Time signatures tell you how many and what kind of notes per measure there are. The number on top is the number of notes per measure, and the bottom number is what kind of note. A measure is a pattern of a group of beats. It is very common to find measures having groups of two, three or four beats. 2 / 2 means 2 beats per measure, 3 / 4 means 3 beats per measure, and 6 / 8 means 6 beats per measure. The bottom figure represents the particular note that receives the beat. Music written in 3 / 4 timing represents that each quarter note gets a beat and that there are 3 such quarter notes in each measure.

For our purposes here we want to relate beats per measure to frames. Assuming that 1 second of time is equal to 1 measure or bar of music, then our musical measure would equal 24 frames at a frame rate of 24 frames per second. If the music is played at 2 beats per measure then frames 12 and 24 receive the beat. If the music is played at 4 beats per measure then the beats would fall on multiples of frames 1, 7, 13, and 19. Therefore, 4 beats per measure has a beat every 6 frames. If the music is played at 3 beats per measure the accent frames are multiples of frames 1, 9, and 17. Therefore 3 beats per measure has a beat every 8 frames. And if the music is played at 6 beats per measure the accent frames are 1,5,9,13,17, and 21. Therefore 6 beats per measure is one beat every 4 frames.

A metronome, also a great animators tool, can be used to give us timing in beats per minute. So for example with the metronome set at 120 bpm (beats per minute) that translates to 120 beats / 60 seconds or 2 beats per second or a beat every 12 frames. That’s the same as saying the timing is 2 beats per measure.

Here are some useful relationships based on metronome settings:
40 bpm – 1 beat every 36 frames
60 bpm - 1 beat every 24 frames
80 bpm – 1 beat every 18 frames
120 bpm – 1 beat every 12 frames
180 bpm – 1 beat every 8 frames
240 bpm – 1 beat every 6 frames

An easy calculation method is:

(total frames/min.) / (total beats/min.) = frames/beat

(1440 frames/min) / (120 beats/min) = 12 frames/beat or 1 beat every 12 frames

Some general rules for animation timing are:

Fast action is 1 beat every 8 frames often referred to as 8 beat

Moderate action (march time or walk time) is 12 beat or 1 beat every 12 frames

Slow action is 20 beat or 1 beat every 20 frames

20 beat timing

So now that you can relate musical beats to screen time, you will understand if someone says "that action should be a 10 beat" exactly what they mean. Set your metronome for a 10 beat which is 144 bpm and you have the rhythm for the action.

To add variety to your timing you shouldn’t accent each beat visually but instead you can use variations like accent just before the beat, or exactly on the beat, or between the beats, or ignore the beats entirely, or only accent significant beats. Remember variety is what keeps the animation more interesting.

By the way if you’re animating to a musical score you may find that the beats hit the frames a little differently then based on a measure being exactly 1 second. Remember musicians are only human and their timing isn’t that precise so listen to a stretch of the music and find the average beat because that will be what you want to work from. Fortunately there is software that can help you with this determination.

Beats are used for more than just timing actions, you can get some really nice results if you learn to plan and time your cuts according to beats as well. More to come...

Continued in Part 3


Anonymous Anonymous said...

awesome blog! thanks a lot, just wanted to say that the lack of comments doesn't mean the lack of readers, most people, usualy, just prefer to read the posts and rarely write anything in comments. keep it up!

11/08/2006 12:48 AM  
Blogger Jerry Keslensky said...

Thanks for the encouragement, we appreciate the thought behind it. Actually we have statistical tracking features that help us to monitor blog readership so we are quite pleased at the numbers of daily and weekly readers which are quite high for this type of subject matter blog. Also we get most of our comments not in the blog but directly through more specific questions directly via e-mails. In case it is not yet easily apparent we are publishing this blog in a more structured form and less randomly so that it will in fact develop into a useful learning resource. Our expectations are for this blog to be frequently "discovered" by aspiring animators and cartoonist and to provide a resource of knowledge and inspiration. Publishing is a previlage and an important way to give back to our community and we will try to continue to serve our current and future readers. And most importantly we want to help as many people as we can to become successful creators of cartoons. There is an ever growing need in the world for them.

11/08/2006 8:49 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!!! I can not express this enough! I am an AM student, I have watched Keith Lengo's VTS stuff and read through the Animators Survival Kit and you have stuff here that is GOLDEN. It really brings the other stuff into context and adds some much needed meat! If I ever get a job in animation I owe a big part to this blog.



10/24/2007 10:57 PM  
Blogger Will said...

Thanx mate as the other comments already say, this is golden =) thankyou

9/14/2008 11:46 PM  
Anonymous Mickey Mousing said...

Thanks from me too. I know (knew) nothing about this subject but needed a crash course because I'm translating a text on music in animated films. All is much clearer now.

10/06/2009 11:16 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

This is fantastic information. Thank you so much for sharing!!! I will be coming back frequently to this blog, for sure.

Another great animation blog is by Brendan Body, an animator at Double Negative in London. He also breaks it down to the prime and then builds it up.

Thanks again.

10/25/2011 12:48 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home